http://globalwarning.over-blog.com/article-6855885-6.html#c Les 25 derniers commentaires publiés sur l'article "L'aveu" du blog "Rechauffement médiatique et pensée unique" fr Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:43:49 +0100 Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:43:49 +0100 Over-blog.com RSS 2.0 Engine Copyright 2009, NC NC Globalwarning: la somme de toutes les peurs http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification/ http://globalwarning.over-blog.com/article-6855885-6.html#comment12217594
La citation d'origine (non sourcée ici) était (j'insite sur le passé)

“On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but — which means that we must include all the doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands, and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climatic change. To do that we need to get some broadbased support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This ‘double ethical bind’ we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both". (Cité dans Discover, pp. 45–48, Oct. 1989, voir aussi American Physical Society, APS News August/September 1996)
http://rpuchalsky.home.att.net/sci_env/sch_quote.html

Citation de 1989!!!!!!!!!!!! Soit il y a preswque 20 ans. Nos connaissances de l'époque n'étaient pas celles de maintenant.

S'il est vrai que c'est l'un des auteur du GIEC, il était auteur-coordinateur du Work group 2 (uniquement) en 2001 (uniquement toujours).

En 2002 il disait “Even the most credible international assessment body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has refused to attempt subjective probabilistic estimates of future temperatures. This has forced politicians to make their own guesses about the likelihood of various degrees of global warming.”]]> Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:35:41 +0200 http://globalwarning.over-blog.com/article-6855885-6.html#comment12217594